A person accused of unveiling on social media the id of the girl on the centre of a high-profile rugby rape trial is to be prosecuted.
The person is to face a cost of breaching the lifetime ban on reporting the id of an alleged sufferer, mentioned the Public Prosecution Service.
The person has not but been named but when convicted faces a tremendous of as much as £5,000.
Rugby gamers Paddy Jackson and Stuart Olding have been each cleared of rape in March after a nine-week trial.
The person who revealed the title of their accuser on social media is because of seem in court docket later this 12 months.
A second suspect won’t face prosecution after the PPS mentioned there was inadequate proof.
Choose’s social media warning: BBC News NI’s Mark Simpson
Social media forged a shadow over the 42-day trial, inflicting frequent interruptions in court docket.
The issue was not the beeps from a sensible cellphone – although that did occur – however the fixed rush to judgement, notably on Twitter.
Repeatedly, Choose Patricia Smyth warned the jury to stay away from social media.
She condemned what she known as “hearth legal professionals” coming to conclusions with out listening to the proof and mentioned they need to be ignored.
Nonetheless, there have been some posts that the authorities couldn’t ignore.
The rape trial could also be over however authorized motion surrounding the case continues.
Complainants in rape trials in Eire and the UK are entitled to anonymity, and it’s an offence to publish their id.
A PPS spokesman mentioned: “The Public Prosecution Service can verify it has taken a choice to prosecute one individual in relation to an allegation of breaching the anonymity granted to a complainant in a excessive profile rape trial.
“After a cautious consideration of all proof, it has been determined to prosecute that individual on one cost of breaching the lifetime ban on reporting the id of an alleged sufferer.
“A second suspect reported individually by police for allegedly breaching the identical complainant’s id won’t be prosecuted after it was concluded there was inadequate proof to show any offence had been dedicated.
“In taking these selections, senior prosecutors thought of proof acquired from police in relation to social media posts which have been alleged to have doubtlessly recognized a complainant concerned in trial proceedings which ran at Belfast Crown Courtroom from January to March 2018.”